Showing posts with label random. Show all posts
Showing posts with label random. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Happy Holidays

I know I haven't been blogging hardly at all. I've been writing, and you should start to see the effects of that next year as I get projects ready to release.

Meanwhile, here's a video, that you may have already seen. It's going viral for good reason. Happy holidays, everyone!

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Lessons from Britain

Our home here in Santa Fe is still under renovation, but we've turned one major corner. People who come by to work or drop things off no longer survey the scene and wonder what kind of crazy people would live in our place. We now get constant compliments calling our place "really nice" and "wonderful." One of the things I love about it is how small it is, and I know I didn't get my preference for small spaces from growing up in New Mexico. The American west, when I was a kid, was all about big houses with giant great rooms. Because land was relatively cheap, people would take advantage of the space they could have.

No, my preference for small, cozy spaces definitely comes from my time in Britain. I first lived over there when I was seventeen, attending the United World College of the Atlantic in south Wales. That was the first time I'd ever seen drizzle that didn't let up for weeks. Her in New Mexico, rain visits for a few hours and then is gone, and drizzle is rare. We tend to get pounded with big droplets that saturate everything before the sun comes out to bake it all dry again.

A lot of people find the weather in the UK oppressive, and I did too for a long time. It's difficult to go from a place where you can see mountains 40 miles away out your window to a place where visibility of one mile is extraordinary. It's possible in a situation like that to feel claustrophobic even when hiking outdoors. I wasn't used to dryness being a luxury, but in a climate where your laundry will get wet again between the laundry room and the dorm, and then stay wet because there's nothing like a dryer in the dorm, mold and rot become all too constant companions.

I have good memories from this time too, though. I remember lying in my cot as a second year, when I got to sleep right by the window with my bed up against the radiator. I'd fall asleep to the sound of raindrops hitting the glass, but be secure in my little cocoon of warmth.

When I moved on to Oxford, even though I had my own room, it was a small room and as this was the time when I was battling a yet-undiagnosed sleep disorder, it paid to have a small area to take care of. I soon figured out how much work it took to keep a living space in order. My energy levels were so low, that there were points in my life when I wouldn't even bother to fold the sun-shade in my car because I didn't have the energy. People laughed, but I was quite serious. I shouldn't have been driving either, but at the time I had no diagnosis or test results to show what on earth was going on. It was in the UK that I saw people living in little cottages and cozy spaces. Few could afford the square footage that a western American family was accustomed to, but they were no poorer for all that. Even now, when house hunting, just stepping into a large house made me feel tired. I imagined all the hours it'd take to clean and want to get out immediately.

This last time I lived in the UK, when my husband did his PhD in London, we moved into a space so small that even my British friends thought it was extreme. While it certainly had its downsides, it always felt manageable. My sleep disorder has long since been treated, but we did have a baby in the UK who screamed a lot. A rough night with him meant only getting sleep in 20 minute increments. All during this time, I felt too exhausted to keep the place in perfect order, but I never felt completely overwhelmed by the housework.

Besides that, it was wonderful to be in a small space with my children, because even when I sat at my computer and worked, I got a lot of interaction with them. I knew what they were doing and heard what they said and they needed only to call out to get my full attention. On a visit back to the US, where I stayed with relatives who had typical, American-sized homes, I found it almost impossible to multi-task. I either followed my boys around, or got work done. There was no doing both. Some people value having the space where they can shut the rest of life out for a while. I don't. I like to be in the thick of life and living whenever I'm at home. I like having my boys able to explore and play on their own without ever being entirely on their own. This way I can helicopter, without butting in unless their play gets dangerous.

When we came back to the US, for a year we rented a small home in Los Alamos that was still too big, and was laid out to provide separation and privacy. My children could easily get out of sight and out of earshot, so when we went looking for a home to buy, I told the realtor to show us small places. Our current home was one of the first candidates. It took me all of five minutes to tour and I told her that this was the sort of thing we were looking for. To her credit, she took me at my word.

The more I live here, the more I love it. It's not cramped or confining. It's got all the types of space we need, and only as much as we need. People see that I have two sons and a husband over six feet tall and wonder how it is I could commit to a place that will soon be packed to the gills with people and life, and there may come a time when we upsize, but it's not part of my firm future plans. I'm curious to see of my boys really do outgrow the space, or whether we ever feel like we need more "stuff" and places to put it. For now, though, we're quite happy as we are.

(I know, the title and the timing made it look like I'd talk about Scotland. The truth is, I've been to Scotland all of twice in my adult life. I lived in the UK long enough to appreciate what I don't know, and my degree in politics from a British university only confirms that. The Union was and is a matter for the people who belong to it. I was only ever a visitor.)

Friday, August 8, 2014

Homeless

For the next week, we'll continue to be "homeless". We have a home, and new one in Santa Fe, but we are renovating it and hence are moving around, from my parents' house to a hotel and so forth. We love our new home, but to live there right now would be difficult because it has no kitchen.

Obviously, I can't give too many details about our new home (one of the few writers I know who had a stalker was less famous than I - which is to say, not famous at all), but I love the place we found. Santa Fe has always been one of my favorite places in the world. I grew up just north of it in Los Alamos (something I can now talk about since I don't live there anymore - it's a small town, so talking about it while I was there would have been almost like giving out my home address).

People who know me know I'm a northern New Mexican through and through, even though I've only lived here since I was one. (If you think that's long enough to be a native of the place, you likely aren't New Mexican.) I used to joke with my law clients about how far my heritage doesn't go back in this state, as quite a few of them were Hispanic (yes, that is the term used here, locally, so please no Latino/Chicanos pouncing on me for using it), or Native American.

Once our renovations are done, I'll be posting some before/after pictures of the interior of our new place. It's an old, historic adobe that was somewhat run down when we bought it. We're gutting much of it and redoing the interior. It's a small place - by American standards, I guess. Less than 1,000 square feet, though we might add on a second bathroom and office for me, which would put us just over 1,000. (This is how we're able to afford the renovations - this house was well within our budget to purchase.) People may think we're nuts for cramming a family of four into this space, especially with two boys who are likely to grow up very big and tall, but we'll see how it goes.

Most of all, I'm grateful to raise my kids in the culture (or cultures, more precisely) that I grew up in. If I could pick anywhere in the world for them to call home, it would be Santa Fe.

Also, I'm about to embark on writing and publishing some fantasy and science fiction works, but more on that later!

Saturday, July 19, 2014

Guilty Pleasures: Married at First Sight

I don't work every waking hour, just most of them. I have time to watch about one to two hours of television a week, and for the next several weeks, one of the hours will be this reality TV show, Married at First Sight, on FYI. People who know me know that I hate reality TV. I watched The Bachelor one season when a whole bunch of friends were watching it as a group - and even then didn't watch all the episodes, and I watched Survivor when a family friend was on it. As soon as he got voted off, I quit watching. This kind of stuff doesn't hold my interest.

So why am I watching a show with the premise of marrying complete strangers and having them live together for five weeks before deciding if they want to stay married or get divorced? Well, I'm hoping this is a different kind of reality TV. Specifically, I hope this is using the reality format to do something groundbreaking. Here are my thoughts so far:

- The "object" of this show is for everybody to win, and that's a new one for reality TV as far as I know. Four experts (that's what they're referred to as in the show, hence I'll just use that same term) in four areas of specialty went through all the candidates for the show and paired off three couples. At this point in the broadcast schedule, those couples have met, gotten married, and had their receptions. If the show creators wanted to set up a train wreck, then they have very poor memories. Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire, with its ridiculous sham marriage and subsequent blow-up did not make for good television and did not earn itself a second season, so if all Married... does is create a disastrous situation, then the network execs should know enough from reality TV history to know that this is going to be a big hurdle for the newly revamped FYI network to clear. Also, this show is based on a show of the same format and premise that aired in Denmark, and two of the three couples did elect to stay married.

- Arranged marriage doesn't squick me the same way it may squick other people. I'm not sure why. Because I went to an international school and saw a plethora of cultures? Because I'm well aware of the fact that I, and anyone else on this planet, is the product of thousands of arranged marriages down through the ages? Because I agree with the assertion at the beginning of this show that love-match marriages are relatively new, from a historical perspective, and divorce rates have increased since they became commonplace? Now, that isn't to say that love-match marriages are the cause of divorces. Despite statistics that show that arranged marriages have only a 4% divorce rate on average around the world, that does not convey the complete picture. Cultures that still practice arranged marriage tend to be more conservative and more condemning of divorce. In some countries, divorce is very difficult if not almost impossible to obtain. Also, the purpose of marriage in these cultures is often quite different and the individuals have had their expectations of marriage cultivated accordingly over the course of their lives.

- If this idea works, the fact that it was implemented in reality TV will make all the difference. A sitcom or a prime time drama about couples who are put into arranged marriages obviously would not be comparable. Any writer can put together a fictional storyline where it all works out or doesn't. The point of this experiment is to see if it works on real people.

What I'm curious to learn:

- Whether arranged marriage could ever work in modern American culture - where people are raised with the expectation that they choose their own spouse, and where property, social status, and other traditional concerns tied to marriage have been largely left by the wayside. These people in the experiment didn't grow up thinking they would marry complete strangers, so without that lifetime of cultivated expectation, can they switch gears and do this?

My predictions, FWIW:

- Jamie and Doug make it and stay married. Okay, so spoiler alert for anyone who wants to click over and watch the first episodes on FYI. Jamie is not exactly happy on her wedding day. She's horrified because she isn't attracted to her spouse. Why do I think they'll make it? Because all the footage has already been shot. The experiment is over. Hence I assume the show is edited to create compelling narratives (reality TV isn't scripted in the traditional sense, but there's still room for plenty of spin.) The experts say up front that they expect Jamie will not be attracted to Doug. When this proves true, the sociologist says a short piece on how our society believes that attraction needs to be there at first sight or it will never grow, and that she thinks this attitude eliminates opportunities in love unnecessarily.

The weddings were *obviously* edited - Jason and Cortney's vows are backwards, if you pay attention. In the show he makes his second. In the actual ceremony he would have made his first. They switched them around for dramatic timing purposes. For Jamie and Doug, we're shown only awkward moments. Her hesitating at the altar. Him telling her he lives with his parents. Her asking the wedding photographer to not require them to be touchy-feely, etc. One of the only positive moments is when Jamie's nephew goes up to greet "Uncle Doug", which fits into the storyline of a nice guy with a strong sense of family and loyalty winning the heart of a woman who has limited experience on the receiving end of either. If Jamie and Doug made it to a happy marriage, then the show creators/editors/etc. are being clever. The premise has been set down: You can fall in love with someone you wouldn't have looked twice at when you first met. This also emphasizes the point of this show: that we don't always pick the best partners for ourselves. So can strangers with areas of expertise in sociology, sexuality, etc. do better than you would do on your own? My prediction is that they'll sure make it look like they can with the editing of this couple's storyline.

- If anyone doesn't make it, I'd say Vaughn and Monet, not because there's anything wrong with these two, but because they're both presented as very independent, self directed people, and that can be an extra challenge in any relationship. I'd think an arranged marriage might amplify that because they go straight from having their own structured life into having to compromise at every turn. Again, I'm not saying that's how these two people actually are - I've seen 120 minutes of footage of them, so I don't know them. That is how they are presented, though, so it seems plausible to me that this could be the narrative.
__

Anyhow, it's been a while since I've blogged, so while figuring out what to blog, I decided to share my interest in this show. I think most reality television is pretty dumb, especially the romantic reality shows. The Bachelor/Bachelorette is, in my opinion, a thoroughly stupid premise. Courtship where a bunch of prospective mates are in direct competition with each other and the one doing the choosing has everyone competing for them, plus the opulent locations and excursions thrown in on the show, make it un-ideal to create lasting romance - to put it mildly. The fact that anyone off this show has gotten married is a testament to human ingenuity and resilience. It looks like the worst possible way to start a relationship. And I'm not a huge fan of watching train wrecks for the sake of entertainment. If a show is supposed to be "reality" then why would I want to watch people "really" get scared, hurt, humiliated, voted off the island, put into orchestrated opposition with one another, etc.? If I take the attitude that the show is mostly fiction - I'd rather watch something that was scripted.

Married at First Sight has six adults who agreed to the premise, willing to give this a try, and we are all invited to cheer them on, learn to care about them, and maybe even gain some insights into how marriages do and don't work. I'm very curious to see how this turns out. (And if it's a train wreck, I will be sorely disappointed.)


Wednesday, May 28, 2014

#YesEveryWoman and #YesAllWomen: Some Thoughts

So the mass shooting in Isla Vista has kicked up debate on gender issues, women's safety, and perceptions of women. I won't rehash the whole debate about whether society is sexist and what needs to change for women to feel safe, but I'll offer a few observations of my own here, some of which I haven't seen stated elsewhere (which isn't to say they haven't been stated at all, I just haven't seen them.)

Women aren't always great at reading men.

You know, all too often in the gender debate women are framed as being more competent, more perceptive, more mature, etc., and I think we women need to recognize how that poisons the dialogue. Why do many women behave as if any man they do not know could be a rapist? Let's be honest about this: Because we aren't necessarily able to tell the difference, even when men can. Men who get offended at being treated like potential rapists might be self centered and not thinking this through, or may in fact wonder why so many females welcome "obviously" dangerous men into their lives and shun "obviously" harmless ones. It's because these things are not always obvious to us.

I was once on a hike with a male friend who, partway through, started poking around in the forest litter by the trail to find a big stick to carry. No, this is not a story about finding out my friend was an aggressor. He'd noticed a guy following us, and I'd missed it. The guy following us was good. He hung back. He was subtle. There was a lot of traffic on the trail. I'd like to say this experience was a lesson learned, but despite the hours I spend people watching and the awareness I try to cultivate, I could miss another instance of this. I have, if not a blind spit, then at least a blurry spot for this, and I see women making more "obvious" mistakes than me all the time.  Them: "But he seemed so nice." Me: "REALLY? Are you nuts?" We aren't always the more intuitive/perceptive gender.

So gentlemen, the next time a woman ducks away when you smile or freaks out when you enter an elevator with her and try to strike up a conversation, rather than get offended and feel like she's disrespecting you, have a little charity. Many of us women, when it comes to male behavior, are like a fashion blind person trying to dress for a major interview. Don't be upset that we're filtering too many good men out. Recognize that we're doing the social equivalent of putting colored paperclips on articles of clothing so that we can coordinate them Garanimals style. It's not always you. Sometimes it's us. And when we get it wrong, the price is incredibly steep, so please let us overcompensate.

Women get rejected too.

Whenever I hear guys complaining about rejection, I struggle not to say, "You think that's bad???" Being the self-motivated, independent person I am, I decided early in my dating life to be the one who asked the guy out for the first date. That isn't to say I turned down dates that I didn't do the asking for, but if I could tell that there was mutual attraction, I made sure to ask first. I figured this would filter out guys who didn't like my personality, because I'm the kind of person who calls many of the shots in my own life. How did the filter work? Well, most of the guys I dated were pretty cool about it. Having said that, it was a terrifying thing to do each and every time. Why? Because I had enough guy friends to overhear their gossip about women, and the female who did the asking did not typically fare well in their universe.

I should add that back in the dark ages when I was dating, men weren't all that used to being asked out, but women's lib had gone far enough that they all thought they were completely onboard with the idea.

And they were wrong, because what they didn't understand about being on the receiving end of the question was that it wasn't all supermodels crooking their fingers across the dance floor. Being the recipient of date requests means being asked out by people you never noticed, don't like, or find annoying. It means learning to be kind when you turn someone down and not telling all your friends what a loser they are (though yes, I'm aware women do this also. My point, guys, is that in my experience, you are often no better and sometimes quite a bit worse.) It means not thinking that someone who wants to date you is "clearly desperate" or is so hot for you that you are entitled to behave however you want and expect them to still be interested.

Maybe the world has changed since then. I hope so. But I would hesitate to say that men get rejected and mocked more often than women. Rejection is rough, guys. We know. No really, we do.

All women are affected by sexual aggression. Hence the #YesEveryWoman and #YesAllWomen hashtags (I'm seeing both).

Too often I hear men complain that women are too wrapped up in the idea of gender wars and too obsessed about their own safety. We are not. Google the latest stats on sex crimes. My guess would be that if you do that today or five years from today or ten, you'll still see that about a quarter of women in the US report a sex crime. Sex crimes are often unreported (how often is difficult to say given they are, as I just said, unreported, but anonymous surveys tend to bring in higher numbers than are reflected on police reports.)

I think a lot of men, and even a lot of women, don't fully comprehend the scale because it's truly mind blowing. I've led a pretty sheltered life in this regard. None of my male friends or partners have ever crossed a line with me. Couple that with my upbringing in a town where nearly everyone has been vetted for a security clearance and you get a pretty good picture of my life. If there's a war of sexual aggression raging, I live far from the front lines.

Nothing I'm about to say in this paragraph contradicts that. I personally know two women who were gang raped and nearly killed in the process - and these are two women willing to talk about it. I have no idea how many rape victims I actually know. I have been first on the scene to an aftermath of a rape. I have had other women confide in me about experiences that they never reported to the authorities.

Though the perpetrators may be few and likely none are reading this blogpost, they are nevertheless effective and far-reaching in their crimes. Next time a woman acts afraid to be alone with you, I want you to repeat these words to yourself: "This woman knows several victims of sex crimes and has a one in four chance of being one herself." Substitute any other word for "sex crimes" and think about this. If it were HIV, we'd be in the middle of a pandemic. If it were attacks by clowns, Ronald McDonald would be a shameful blot on the history of McDonald's marketing efforts that the franchise chain might never overcome. If it were sightings of Big Foot, this would make sasquatches more numerous in North America than all wild cougars, bears, and wolves put together.

It's just a statistic that's been around so long that it's lost its punch with a lot of people. Don't let that happen to you. Reasonable women get jumpy over it.

Most men are good people who are repulsed by and even outraged at sex crimes.

And women know that. If men need us to say it more often, then just ask. "You know that I'd never do something like that, right?" "You realize I'm shocked that happened, don't you?" and the like are reasonable questions. Ask them as often as you need to hear the answers. Also understand that women could use a few, "That was terrible and you shouldn't have to live in fear of that," affirmations from the men in their lives. And yes, we should ask for them, too. Ladies, the same rules apply. Unprompted affirmations are great, but the lack of them isn't proof of some deep moral flaw. Humans of both genders need prompts now and then.

The Isla Vista shooter was once at a party where he got pushed off a wall and broke his ankle, and one of his complaints about the experience was that no hot girls offered to have sex with him to make him feel better afterwards. Do I wish more guys would say this is messed up? Yes I do. It just seems like the kind of thing that should provoke a strong reaction. So, guys, you think this is messed up, right? Now there may be a troll or ten lurking out there with nothing better to do than spam my comments, but deep down I know that the majority of you reading this blogpost are nodding in agreement. It still would make a difference if more men said as much. You can post in my comments if you want, or even better, turn to the woman next to you and let her know. Even if it's always been clear to her you're no rapist, affirmations help soothe the hind brain, where the knee-jerk fears lurk for all genders of the human race.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Kevin Olusola, the beatboxing cellist

Many may have already seen this, but I still think it's pretty cool. Kevin Olusola went on to win The Sing Off with the group, Pentatonix.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Computer woes over, for now

Phew, well, sorry I was out of the loop for a week there. This time I had an excuse. My last netbook broke (after being dropped at least a dozen times on a hard floor - thank you kiddos), then the keyboard on my desktop broke, then the power cord on the netbook that my husband loaned me broke, but now I've got a new netbook that is an updated version of my old one, that endured multiple drops onto a hard floor from three feet and higher. Gotta love Samsung - or I do, at least.

So I'm behind on my book reviewing and all that, but will get caught up here!

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Jeff Bezos is reading Leviathan Wakes, and so should you!

So, of all the random coincidences, this one is pretty cool. Jeff Bezos announced the release of the Kindle Fire today, and during his demo, he waved his own Kindle Fire around, like this:
And there, on the screen behind him is a Kindle, displaying chapter one of Leviathan Wakes (The Expanse). The author of this book is James SA Corey, who doesn't actually exist. This is the pen name for Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck.

I introduced these guys to each other. Daniel and I were in the same writer's group for years, and Ty and I met at a science fiction convention in Los Angeles. Ty came to visit me in New Mexico, met the rest of my writer's group, and wrote an rpg for them that they loved so much that Daniel asked Ty to cowrite a novel based in the game with him.

And yes, the book is good too. I haven't read the published version, but the rough draft was better than a lot of what you'll find out there.



  

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Buying a Kindle

Kindle, Wi-Fi, Graphite, 6" Display with New E Ink Pearl Technology - includes Special Offers & Sponsored ScreensaversOver the past ten years, my reading has dropped precipitously. Now, granted, I always read a lot more than a normal person, but it's been a few years since I've read the 1-3 books a week I read all the way through college and law school. I'd assumed the reason for this was my ongoing membership in critique groups, most notably Critical Mass. In these groups I was always reading multiple novels under construction, and it was my job to point out everything I did and didn't like about them. Orson Scott Card once wrote that when his wife, Kristine, began to do this for him, she found it hard to read other books. She'd put them down when she was bored, or when she'd figured out the end.

Another reason is that I rarely have a hand free. Between kid wrangling, jewelry making, knitting, crocheting, blogging, and whatever else it is that takes up all my time (still a mystery to me), I can't hold a book at the same time. Audio books put me to sleep. For one thing, people speak waaaaaay more slowly than I read, so I find them boring beyond belief, and secondly, the last time anyone read me a book was before bedtime when I was a kid.

A couple of my friends have published ebooks, and if you didn't know, quite often the author gets a bigger cut of the e-book sales than the print sales. I downloaded the Kindle app to my computer so I could read them, and realized I was doomed. It turns out my appetite for books hasn't slackened in the least, just my ability to get them in a form I can devour.

Next week, Trevor will be back in the US for a conference, and we're having a Kindle shipped out to his address there. The US has lower prices (lower taxes) on electronics. Ever since I placed the order, I've been browsing cases and gelskins; I feel like I'm preparing for another child and need to make sure it has everything it needs.

So, yes, I am way behind the curve. Nearly everyone reading this has at least one Kindle. I'd say I was keeping it real, but actually I've never been trendy. At all. Anyone who's seen my wardrobe would know.

Thursday, August 19, 2010

It's the stupidity that gets old...

I didn't sleep last night, which means my brain is fairly useless today. I just screwed up a new scrapbooking project I was doing by saving over a file. It's the second time I've done that. An hour's work, gone. Oh well. I console myself by pointing out that it wasn't great work. I'm too tired.

On days like this, I can't write. Over the years I've tried a million different approaches to this kind of day. One thing I've learned, don't get up and go-go-go. That sends me into a hyper phase that'll last days if not weeks and will make my sleep cycle deteriorate even faster. If I can stay mellow, there's a much better chance that I'll sleep tonight. Some, at least.

And then maybe I'll get my brain back! Many thanks to Char Peery, Samantha Ling, Trevor Tippetts, and Sandra Mah Benzie for reading my book and getting me notes. Such an act of charity, if you ask me. I'm well into rewrites, and I look forward to being able to do more. Once I can do things like keep track of a narrative flow... So far, this blog post is about as long as I can go before rambling off on some other topic, like this morning when the mail came and I got an offer for something that I promptly hid from myself and now I wonder what it is and where I'll find it and if my son will find it first and did it have any stickers or anything like that in it....

I really want to go to sleep :-(

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Critique of The Last Airbender: Floating World (FacePainting)

Floating World (FacePainting)

For the most part, I agree with this article. I too find it ridiculous and blatantly racist that the lead for The Last Airbender went to an unknown white actor. I have to say, though, I found two aspects of the analysis flawed. The first was very insulting, and was this sentence:

Americans have a long standing history of playing other ethnic minorities, starting as far as 1829 with the play “Metamora."

"American" does not equal white. It never has, and that's institutional racism, pure and simple. I'm half white. I am all American.

The second was the argument that because The Last Airbender was done in English, this implies the leads are white. The article takes this as a serious argument. It's not. English isn't just for the English anymore. There are more English speakers in India than there are in England, so it's a dumb argument. Period. That, I feel, should have been added to the other analysis in the article.

But, sad to say, this article and ones like it needed to be written. I will not be going to see The Last Airbender. I agree. It's yellowface, blatant and inexcusable.

Saturday, June 5, 2010

If you like scary movies

http://www.stthomas.edu/engineering/jpabraham/

Okay, it's a science lecture, but it still scared me. I realize not everyone likes to listen to a university professor interpret graphs for 85 minutes straight. This lecture is a university professor debunking a climate change skeptic who fabricated much of his evidence and misrepresented nearly all of his sources. It includes the original evidence, articles, and even emails from the scientists the skeptic quotes.

What I find horrifying about this is that the skeptic has been invited to speak at universities to educated people, and only those willing to actually look at his sources will see that something's amiss. I always believe in taking a second look at anything interesting I hear, but I do also expect that when someone cites sources, they are citing them correctly, else why bother listening to anything they say?

I do understand being skeptical about climate change. However, I don't understand a) being ignorant of it - seriously, if I could have a nickel for every stupid joke about global warming that belies the joker hasn't even skimmed the Wikipedia article on it... it's a theory that entails life as we know it changing irrevocably. Disbelieve it if you want, but at least *know* it first. Or b) aggressive anti-intellectualism and a culture that allows someone like this skeptic, who's never published a peer reviewed paper in any subject and has no formal training in science to be given the same venue as people who've dedicated their careers to collecting and interpreting data.

Anyway, this week I've been experiencing somnolence, which is the flip side of insomnia. Rather than not being able to sleep, I have a hard time staying awake and will nap in 2-3 hour stretches throughout the day and night. It's difficult to parent this way, and impossible to do anything else in addition to that. (But yes, science lectures do keep me awake; I find them interesting.) These attacks usually last about a week or so, and I wish they left me all rested up for the next wave of insomnia, but no. I think something other than conventional exhaustion drives somnolence. But you'll hear more from me again when I'm awake :-)

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Life gets boring

when I have no energy. I spend a lot of my days doing menial, unblogworthy stuff - though I'm not sure I do anything more interesting when I do have energy, but it feels more interesting to me and thus I'm more inclined to inflict it on other people via the internet.

But I've been slow to update this blog and ought to say something. I'll try to come up with something more interesting next week.

Today, rather than write, I sent out more agent submissions. It's considerably less painful than submissions usually are for me; I guess because I was proactive about getting my synopsis and outline written up front. Always a good idea.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

I have a monitor! And a printer!

Those both arrived today, so I'm hoping my wonderful, dear, beloved husband will hoist them over to the desk tonight so that I can start using them to play World of Warcraft! Oh yeah, and to upload pictures of the jewelry I've made and design an Etsy shop banner and stuff like that too.

It's going to feel so odd tomorrow not to have to stay home, waiting for various delivery people. I'll be able to go run errands and walk around the neighborhood. (But let's be honest here, I'll probably be playing World of Warcraft.)

In my defense, let me say I did hit 65,000 words on the novel today. I've earned some goof off time.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

My blog went down, did yours?

My blog went down New Year's Day, so I went into the Blogger settings and moved it from http://www.emilymah.com/ to its blogspot address. When I tried to move it back to my own domain, I got the "Another blog is hosted at this address error".

It's a well known error message, but none of the old troubleshoots worked. What did work, for any of you frustratedly surfing the web, trying to fix this, was to log into the GoogleApps for this domain and disable the "Pages" feature. I may not know what I'm talking about (I probably don't), but my guess is that Google revamped some of its features through Google Apps and that screwed up the blog hosting.

I'm blogging this from Colorado. Go 10,000 words of the novel written so far. Today we'll be visiting friends and tomorrow we'll head back to New Mexico.

And one week from now we'll be boarding a plane to the UK!

Saturday, August 22, 2009

So, this is cool

Someone posted this to a listserv that I am on. It's really quite amazing. I gather this woman won "Ukraine's Got Talent".

This article gives the piece some context.

Monday, August 10, 2009

My dragon hatched!

I now have a little baby fire dragon named XiWangMu. The more people click on her, the faster she will grow up. According to her site, she's feeling a little lonely.

If you're reading this on FaceBook, you need to come to www.emilymah.com to see her.

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Click the dragon egg!

All right, all of you people who've been no doubt refreshing my site all day, waiting for me to post, please click the dragon egg to the right. That round ball shaped thing? That's a dragon egg. I adopted it. The more people click it, the faster it will grow (though there are limits, so refreshing the page over and over won't really help it, but thanks for planning to do that because I'm so sure all of you readers were.)

It's an Eastern Dragon, and I'm curious to see what it'll look like. The animation will hatch and it will grow, but only if you click it! And we'll see how well I can keep a virtual pet...